Return to Lesson

Types of Skepticism Fact-Matching Game

Turn off ads with a Pro Membership!

Summoning Knowledge...

About This Challenge

Are you ready to challenge your skepticism in a fun and engaging way? Introducing our fact-matching game where you must piece together important information fragments to uncover the truth. Dive into the world of skepticism and sharpen your critical thinking skills!

  • Utilize spells for hints
  • Use spells for extra time
Need a Hint? View the Facts
  • Pyrrhonian skepticism is a type of skepticism that argues that knowledge is impossible to attain and suspends judgment on all beliefs.
  • Academic skepticism is a type of skepticism that asserts that knowledge is possible but difficult to attain, leading to suspension of judgment on most matters.
  • Cartesian skepticism, inspired by René Descartes, aims to doubt everything that can possibly be doubted in order to find a secure foundation for knowledge.
  • External world skepticism questions the existence of an external world independent of our perceptions and experiences.
  • Semantic skepticism challenges the possibility of achieving a clear and determinate meaning for words and concepts.
  • Moral skepticism is the view that there are no objective moral truths or that moral knowledge is unattainable.
  • Meta-ethical skepticism questions the nature of ethical statements and the possibility of moral knowledge.
  • Agnostic skepticism asserts that certain knowledge about the existence or non-existence of a deity or deities is unattainable.
  • Epistemological skepticism challenges the possibility of knowledge and our ability to justify beliefs about the world.
  • Inductive skepticism questions the reliability of inductive reasoning and the justification for believing in generalizations based on past experiences.
  • Phenomenal skepticism doubts the accuracy of our perceptions and sensory experiences as reliable sources of knowledge about the world.
  • Ethical skepticism challenges the possibility of objective ethical truths and the reliability of moral judgments.
  • Transcendental skepticism questions the validity of a priori knowledge and the possibility of knowing things beyond our sensory experience.
  • Scientific skepticism advocates for the use of empirical evidence and critical thinking to evaluate claims and beliefs, while remaining open to revising beliefs based on new evidence.
  • Political skepticism questions the legitimacy and authority of political institutions, leaders, and systems of governance.
  • Existential skepticism challenges the assumptions about the meaning and purpose of life, existence, and human consciousness.
  • Evolutionary skepticism questions the reliability of our cognitive faculties and beliefs, suggesting that they may be products of natural selection rather than truth-tracking mechanisms.
  • Legal skepticism questions the fairness, objectivity, and efficacy of legal systems and the principles of justice.
  • Religious skepticism challenges the truth claims of religious doctrines, beliefs, and practices, often leading to doubts about the existence of a divine being.
  • Radical skepticism proposes that knowledge is unattainable and that we cannot have justified beliefs about the world, leading to a radical form of doubt.

Need a Refresher?

Return to the Main Lesson
Scroll to Top