Return to Lesson

The Problem of Testimony Timeline Game

Turn off ads with a Pro Membership!

Summoning Knowledge...

About This Challenge

In exploring ‘The Problem of Testimony,’ a fascinating aspect to consider is the reliability of historical accounts. This game challenges players to place events in their correct chronological order, emphasizing the importance of accurate testimony in understanding history.

  • Players must carefully analyze the details of each event to determine its proper place in the timeline.
  • As players progress through the game, they gain a deeper appreciation for the significance of accurate testimony in preserving historical accuracy.
Need a Hint? View the Facts
  • c. 369-368 BC: Plato's dialogue 'Theaetetus' discusses the problem of testimony
  • c. 350 BC: Aristotle explores the issue of testimony in his work 'Rhetoric'
  • 13th-14th centuries: Medieval philosophers such as Thomas Aquinas and John Duns Scotus discuss the reliability of testimony
  • 1748: David Hume raises skepticism about the reliability of testimony in his work 'An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding'
  • 1781: Immanuel Kant addresses the problem of testimony in his 'Critique of Pure Reason'
  • 1925: George Edward Moore argues for the reliability of testimony in his essay 'A Defence of Common Sense'
  • 1953: Ludwig Wittgenstein discusses the role of testimony in language games in his work 'Philosophical Investigations'
  • 1968: Donald Davidson explores the issue of testimony in his essay 'On Saying That'
  • 2002: Hilary Kornblith argues for the epistemic significance of testimony in his book 'Knowledge and its Place in Nature'
  • 2008: Jennifer Lackey defends the reliability of testimony in her book 'Learning from Words: Testimony as a Source of Knowledge'
  • 2007: Elisabeth Fricker introduces the concept of 'testimonial injustice' in her book 'Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing'
  • 2008: Miranda Fricker further develops the concept of testimonial injustice in her article 'Epistemic Injustice and a Role for Virtue in the Politics of Testimony'
  • 2012: Linda Zagzebski discusses the role of trust in testimony in her book 'Epistemic Authority: A Theory of Trust, Authority, and Autonomy in Belief'
  • 2018: Heather Battaly explores the intersection of virtue epistemology and testimony in her book 'Epistemic Authority: A Theory of Trust, Authority, and Autonomy in Belief'
  • 2012: Jose Medina introduces the concept of 'hermeneutical injustice' in his book 'The Epistemology of Resistance: Gender and Racial Oppression, Epistemic Injustice, and Resistant Imaginations'
  • 2007: Rebecca Kukla examines the role of identity in testimonial exchange in her article 'Social Identity and Epistemic Agency in Testimonial Practice'
  • 2011: Kristie Dotson develops the concept of 'testimonial smothering' in her article 'Tracking Epistemic Violence, Tracking Practices of Silencing'
  • 2001: Miriam Solomon discusses the ethics of testimony in her book 'Social Empiricism'

Need a Refresher?

Return to the Main Lesson
Scroll to Top